6.6.5 Test the notes and record friction

6.6.5.1 Cold usability check

Choose one unopened practice case. Use the numbered notes without a walkthrough or a path hint. Produce an evidence-bound next decision, not just an attack name. Bring your attempt back to the tutor for review; this page does not mark you passed.

6.6.5.2 Capture one concrete friction point

Section number:
Starting access/context:
Exact synthetic output line that confused me:
What I thought it meant:
Missing explanation, prerequisite or link:
Next check I selected and why:
Assistance used:

Keep actual target details and secrets in private lab records. This template creates no online submission and sends no messages.

6.6.5.3 Turn feedback into a bounded repair

Fix the owning explanation, field definition, command context or receiving link; avoid adding another disconnected page. Verify command preservation and links, then use a fresh paper case to test the repair. A tool/environment failure, documentation gap and learner skill gap are separate possibilities.

6.6.5.4 Measure usefulness

Record whether you found the right section, identified the decisive evidence, avoided an unsupported claim and justified the next check. Retention and later independent target execution are separate assessments. No score or mastery is inferred before you attempt the case.